Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 0:33:23 GMT -5
Wonder if perhaps no one would have been excluded from the exam if instead of classrooms with tables and chairs there had been ballot boxes. MIR Alberto Soler Montagud , need your help to continue reporting Become a member of Nuevatribuna Unlike the Covid positives who were able to vote in the last Catalan regional elections (and who will also vote in those of Castilla León on February the Ministry of Health did not react to the requests for alternatives so that the MIR candidates who who tested positive for Covid could be examined last Saturday, January 29, offering the only solution to wait for next year's call. It is regrettable that the Administration has not provided mechanisms for all applicants for positions in Medicine, Nursing, Biology, Pharmacy, Psychology, Chemistry and Physics to have unhindered access to the exam just as they could (and will be able to within two weeks) vote.
The positive ones in the aforementioned elections. A simple measure so that the infected candidates could have been examined (while ensuring the protection of the healthy ones) would have Malta Phone Number been to set up special classrooms for positives, in which the examiners and all auxiliary personnel were protected, even resorting - if necessary would have been considered appropriate—to clothing equivalent to that worn by healthcare professionals. Well in advance of the exam, the Spanish Confederation of Medical Unions (CESM) looked for alternatives that the Government agreed to reconsider, without the union representatives receiving any response other than to postpone the exam for those affected for one year, something that encouraged the risk that some positive examinees or those who were close contacts of an infected person would decide to go to the call. The ministry has been unable to react to requests from medical unions and other groups that requested alternative solutions. In the opinion of many - among whom I include myself - the Government's decision has been as radical as it is erroneous, since it creates the probability that positive MIR applicants, or those who suspect they are, have attended the exam as one year of their career is at stake.
Professional. If this were the case and if there were consequences, the responsibility should be attributed to the rigid stance of the Ministry of Health, which was unable to react to the requests of the medical unions and other groups that, well in advance, requested alternative solutions. For the benefit of common sense, and also to avoid incurring comparative grievances with non-infected MIR applicants or with citizens who can go to a polling station being positive, the sensible and appropriate thing for the Administration would have been to offer a more alternative beyond its radical position of refusing to enable special classrooms for positives. It is regrettable that those affected have been many recently licensed doctors who, in large numbers, have responded in solidarity and humanitarianly to the call for help launched by the Government due to the lack of health professionals in times of pandemic.
The positive ones in the aforementioned elections. A simple measure so that the infected candidates could have been examined (while ensuring the protection of the healthy ones) would have Malta Phone Number been to set up special classrooms for positives, in which the examiners and all auxiliary personnel were protected, even resorting - if necessary would have been considered appropriate—to clothing equivalent to that worn by healthcare professionals. Well in advance of the exam, the Spanish Confederation of Medical Unions (CESM) looked for alternatives that the Government agreed to reconsider, without the union representatives receiving any response other than to postpone the exam for those affected for one year, something that encouraged the risk that some positive examinees or those who were close contacts of an infected person would decide to go to the call. The ministry has been unable to react to requests from medical unions and other groups that requested alternative solutions. In the opinion of many - among whom I include myself - the Government's decision has been as radical as it is erroneous, since it creates the probability that positive MIR applicants, or those who suspect they are, have attended the exam as one year of their career is at stake.
Professional. If this were the case and if there were consequences, the responsibility should be attributed to the rigid stance of the Ministry of Health, which was unable to react to the requests of the medical unions and other groups that, well in advance, requested alternative solutions. For the benefit of common sense, and also to avoid incurring comparative grievances with non-infected MIR applicants or with citizens who can go to a polling station being positive, the sensible and appropriate thing for the Administration would have been to offer a more alternative beyond its radical position of refusing to enable special classrooms for positives. It is regrettable that those affected have been many recently licensed doctors who, in large numbers, have responded in solidarity and humanitarianly to the call for help launched by the Government due to the lack of health professionals in times of pandemic.